“do you want to sell sugary drinks for the rest of your life, or do you want to come with me and change people's lives?” when steve jobs said this to pepsi executive john scully to lure him to apple, what he did not know (even though he meant good) was that his devices would make the new generation visually impaired, if not totally blind, by the age of 40 (and that is a liberal estimate, it could very well be 30!) because of the close proximity of harmful light his devices bring to the eyes of kids... (this is my own statement, not a quote from someone else's statement, after observing my daughter the way she constantly uses her ipod for chat). now that is still a change in people's lives (even though that change he did not mean to bring about)!
Sunday, May 25, 2014
Friday, May 23, 2014
you alone!
o longing mind,
dwell within the depth
of your own pure nature.
do not seek your home elsewhere.
do not confine your innate infinity
within the mansions of finitude.
your naked awareness alone, o mind,
is the inexhaustible abundance
for which you long so desperately!
-rkp
dwell within the depth
of your own pure nature.
do not seek your home elsewhere.
do not confine your innate infinity
within the mansions of finitude.
your naked awareness alone, o mind,
is the inexhaustible abundance
for which you long so desperately!
-rkp
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
indian slobs!
washington, dc: the
ongoing case of subhash kapoor – the notorious art thief who is now standing
trial in tamil nadu for allegedly selling stolen indian artifacts to museums
around the world – is getting a bit stranger, as it appears that despite the
efforts of the us government to return some $100 million worth of stolen art,
india doesn’t seem particularly interested in getting these items back.
the us immigration and
customs enforcement (ice) agency has seized about $100 million worth of stolen
artifacts, all of which apparently came from kapoor, according to a report by
archaeologist and activist dr. kirit mankodi. these were taken from kapoor’s
“art of the past” business in new york , and appear to mostly
have originated from religious sites around the states of tamil nadu and madhya
pradesh.
one such piece is a
stone sculpture of the buddha, which originated in the chola era, while another
sculpture of bharhut yakshi is estimated at $15 million in value. other works
include a sandstone sculpture of the mahakoka, a bird-like goddess, which was
reported stolen in july of 2004.
these works, along with
many others, have been collected and are waiting to be sent off to india . but due to a lack of
activity from india ’s side, they have been
languishing in a warehouse in the us. indian authorities are demanding to see
proof of where these works originated, and want to make sure they can trace the
full histories of these objects before taking them back.
the news is unusual, as
just this january, the successful handover of a sandstone sculpture took place
at the indian consulate general in new york city . india has been swift to
arrest and prosecute kapoor for his alleged crimes, but their delaying in
reclaiming these works of art is somewhat unexpected.
last month, the toledo
museum of art had a similar problem, when it reached out to the indian
consulate general and embassy regarding what to do with its ganesha idol.
kapoor sold that idol to the museum, along with several other works over a
ten-year timespan. if they are stolen, the museum wants to return them, but it
has received no communication from indian authorities.
“we
have had no contact from the indian side,” said kelly fritz garrow, the
director of communications at the toledo museum of art. “we wrote to the indian
consulate in new york on july 13 of last year, when we first found out that there may
be an issue, but we received no response to that. we wrote another letter
recently [to the embassy], when we put out the information about the items we
bought from kapoor, but once the us government got involved with us, we’ve
worked directly with them. we hoped to work directly with the indian
government, but that didn’t happen, so the justice department is our primary
contact.”
kapoor’s stolen art
found its way to museums outside of the us, as well. the national gallery of australia , which bought a 900
year-old bronze statue of the hindu god shiva from kapoor, has sued him for $5
million. they’ll have to wait until his current trial is resolved before
getting their shot at him.
as for the art collected
by ice – it’s still sitting in a department of homeland security warehouse, a
sad state of affairs in which the public can’t appreciate it, and its home
government can’t (or won’t) claim it.
deepak chitnis for the
american bazaar
Monday, February 24, 2014
occupy museums!
a view of the intervention from the floor of the atrium. (image provided by g.u.l.f.
aka gulf ultra luxury faction)
last night, over 40
protesters staged an intervention inside the guggenheim museum in manhattan during saturday night’s
pay-what-you-wish admission hours. unfurling mylar banners, dropping leaflets,
chanting words, handing out information to museum visitors, and drawing
attention with the use of a baritone bugle, the group worked to highlight the
labor conditions on saadiyat Island in the united arab emirates, where guggenheim abu dhabi, a franchise of new york’s guggenheim, is being built.
staged in the midst of the museum’s
newly opened italian futurism exhibition, the
intervention, a term used by some members of the group to describe the action,
received both applause from visitors who seemed excited by the commotion and
reactions of confusion from others unsure what was going on.
flyers
raining down onto the floor of the guggenheim museum in manhattan, while
protesters and chant and hold banners over the railings of the museum (all
photos by the author for hyperallergic unless otherwise noted)
the intervention began
at 6:45pm est with a bugle call and a loud question: “who is building the guggenheim abu dhabi?” the whole action continued for roughly 20 minutes,
during which time security guards appeared to react slowly to the protesters as
hundreds of museum visitors captured images and video of the protests.
the participants, who were a
diverse group of artists, professors, students, and activists loosely
affiliated with occupy museums, gulf labor, and various nyu-related groups,
timed their protest to take place during the pay-what-you-wish hours of the
museum, which normally charges $22 admission for adults. when I asked
organizers if they purposely chose their action to coincide with the italian futurism exhibition and the
carrie mae weems retrospective, they told me that they did not, but that they
were delighted for the coincidence since futurism sought to combine art and
politics, while weems is a champion of those who have been
historically excluded from museums.
the front cover of an
informational brochure distributed during the february 22nd intervention. It
was
designed by noah fischer of occupy museums
“this is a new
phase of the campaign, we’re moving beyond talk to action, and bringing it home
obviously to the guggenheim,” said andrew ross, a nyu professor of sociology,
who is involved in the gulf labor coalition and the nyu fair labor coalition.
“there are so many more people involved in this action that were not involved
in gulf labor until this point. we’re widening the circle of participation, and
that will have an impact.”
gulf labor is
a coalition of artists, academics, and activists who have worked for over a
year to ensure that the labor conditions on saadiyati sland in abu dhabi , which will house guggenheim- and
louvre-branded museums and a nyuNYU-affiliated university, are not exploitative to
workers. many human rights organizations say that the workers who are brought
to saadiyat island are victimized by the nation’s
sponsorship system and face grueling and inhuman conditions on a daily basis.
during our
brief conversation, ross explained how their work raising awareness about
workers’ debt, which translates to a type of indentured servitude for migrant
workers, is connected to much bigger issues.
“we’re
trying to make a connection with chains of debt that are transnational, and in
the various locations we’re looking at, Bangladesh, abu dhabi, nyu, and the art
world, there’s an enormous accumulation of debt in each of these places, and
the money is getting extracted by the transnational creditor class,” ross said.
“and artists are more and more [in debt], and in order to practice art, you’re
required to take on a big debt burden … so there’s a connection across many
continents. another art world is possible, one that’s more principled and
ethical, and that looks out for the human and labor rights of all. artists
should not be asked to exhibit in museums that have been built on the back of
abused workers … that’s what it boils down to. when you’re acquired by a museum
that does that, that’s unfair. your complicity is being bought along with the
artwork.”
a close-up of some of the banners unfurled during the intervention
the idea of using art as a way to reimagine the world
was at the heart of another participant’s passion for the issue. “art, among other
things, is about doing, living, and imagining a better world,” said
artist nitasha dhillon of mtl collective. “art should not violate human
rights, art should not endanger workers lives, and art should not create debt
slaves. and definitely not be part of a system that creates debt bondage.”
she sees yesterday’s action as “a call for solidarity and a call for museums to do the right thing.” she added that “it’s important for museum goers to understand what kind of system they are participating in.”
one college student I
spoke to, who originally hailed from china, said she was taking part in this,
her first action, because it excited her to think about how art and social
justice can work together to help change people’s lives. When I asked her how that
interconnectedness changed her perception of art, she replied: “It changes art
for the better for me.” she said she’d like to bring these ideas to china when she returns.
one polish
artist who participated with the group dropped one-sided leaflets he printed
and brought to the event. the ambiguous pieces of paper featured an eye, a
recycling symbol, an ekg, and the words “human toy tool.”
i recorded
as much of the intervention as I could on my smartphone, and the video is
posted here:
after guards removed all the remaining banners, the intervention participants slowly left the museum. one man, who was playing the bugle, was temporarily detained by the nypd, though he was released after a few minutes without providing id or other personal information. guggenheim guards, who were obviously unnerved by the event, yelled at one participant in front of the museum entrance. a few moments later, a guard came out to the street to tell hundreds of people lined up in front of the museum that no one else would be allowed into the building that evening. the crowd was visibly disappointed and many people lingered hoping the museum administration would change their mind.
museum
visitors reading the manifesto tacked to the wall beside the introductory text
to the italian futurism exhibition.
after the intervention, i encountered artist amin husain, who helped lead the chants, and i asked him if he thought it was all a success. “i think it was well-received by the people in the museum. oOne person told me that they didn’t know that was happening, so public education is really important,” he said. i asked him about the exhibitions themselves and whether he thought people understood what they were saying in that context, and he said he did: “i think the context is really appropriate, because they [the futurists] talked about restructuring the universe, so clearly the museum is giving that some thought at this moment, and we want to talk about restructuring the universe without fascism and without slave labor.”
the intervention, which was the first by a new coalition that includes occupy museums, gulf labor, and various new york university–affiliated groups, came about after a month of meetings between the various organizations. the coalition, which was using the acronym g.u.l.f. (gulf ultra luxury faction) to identify themselves in their informational brochure, hope that this will be the first in a series that builds bridges in their continuing fight for social justice. the next event is scheduled for wednesday, february 26, 5:15pm est, at nyu’s global center for academic & spiritual life (gcasl), which is located at 238 thompson street, room 369, in manhattan’s greenwich village.
hyperallergic reached out to the guggenheim museum for comment last night, and we have yet to hear back from the organization. [update: the guggenheim director richard armstrong has provided hyperallergic with a statement ]
The
G.U.L.F. coalition’s manifesto that was placed on the wall of the museum and
read by visitors
these were the words participants were chanting last night (according to a text provided to hyperallergic during the intervention):
below:
a readers comment with a photo on original news site:
image taken from 1971
demonstration/performance by the art workers coalition at the guggenheim museum
in support of art workers' coalition co-founder hans haacke, whose exhibition
was canceled by the museum’s director over his artwork shapolsky et al.,
manhattan real estate holdings, a real time social system, as of May 1, 1971.
photographer unknown.
Monday, February 10, 2014
master forger. who?
art historian thierry lenain claims italian frequently forged artworks in order to obtain the originals from their owners by giving them the copies
he is known as a renaissance great – but michelangelo was also a
skilled forger who made copies of major works before ageing them with smoke and
swapping them for the originals.
the little known details of his penchant for forgery were
revealed by art historian thierry lenain at the institut français in london .
according to mr lenain, author of art forgery: the history of the modern obsession,
the italian frequently forged artworks in order to obtain the originals from
their owners by giving them the copies. on one occasion, michelangelo made a
painted copy of a print representing saint anthony by the engraver martin
schongauer, making his version so similar to the original it was impossible to
tell which one was which.
speaking
at the view festival of art history, mr lenain said: “he admired these
originals for the excellence of their art and sought to surpass them.”
this is not the first time rumours of the artist’s forgeries
have emerged. one anecdote describes how in 1496 a young michelangelo copied a
roman sculpture, sleeping cupid. he buried it in the ground to give it the
various stains, scratches and dents needed to make it look like a genuine
antique. he then used a middleman to sell the piece to cardinal riario for a
substantial sum.
according to mr lenain, michelangelo’s copies earned him great
notoriety, which helped launch his career.
significantly, the perception of art forgery in the renaissance
era was very different to the negative attitudes which developed in later
centuries.
“in late-modern forgeries, the main goal consists not so much in
the creation of a work of art than in the construction of a trap,” said mr
lenain.
“the most important authors on art, from the renaissance to the
18th century, had a completely different approach to the issue,” he explained.
“far from condemning those who performed that kind of trick, they hailed them
with the utmost enthusiasm.”
chloe hamilton
for the independent
Tuesday, January 28, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)